The first week of implementation is shifting exporter attention from “what changed” to “how to file, how to cost, and where mistakes happen”
Observed on April 7, 2026: Announcement No. 2 of 2026 took effect on April 1, 2026. Export VAT rebates for 249 listed solar and other products have been cancelled, while 22 battery items carry a 6% rebate rate from April 1 through December 31, 2026 before going to zero on January 1, 2027. Based on official rules and the first week's most common exporter questions, current risks are concentrated in customs export date judgment, HS-code matching, repricing, and filing-document consistency.
1. Lock down the execution rules first
In the first week after implementation, the biggest problem is acting from memory instead of from the official rules. The following points are already settled:
| Item | Official Rule | Execution Reminder |
|---|---|---|
| 249 products | Export VAT rebate cancelled from April 1, 2026 | Do not keep using old rebate assumptions in margin or pricing models |
| 22 battery items | 6% from April 1 to December 31, 2026; cancelled from January 1, 2027 | Do not keep using 9%, but do not treat them all as 0% yet either |
| Rate judgment timing | The customs export date shown on the declaration controls | Contract date and expected vessel departure date do not control the rate |
| Classification basis | HS code in the annexes and the 2026A rebate-rate database controls | Similar product names do not guarantee the same rebate treatment |
| Consumption tax | Consumption tax policy stays unchanged for listed products that are subject to it | Do not assume VAT-rebate cancellation means the consumption tax treatment also changed |
"The most common first-week deviation is not misunderstanding the policy itself, but leaving systems, quote sheets, and declaration logic stuck in the pre-April 1 setting."
2. Which sectors are seeing the most first-week friction
Based on the official rules and the questions exporters are focusing on first, the sharpest implementation issues remain in chemicals, batteries and upstream battery materials, solar, ceramics, and glass. Chemicals and battery-related products are the most exposed to “the classification was right, but the rebate treatment was wrong.”
2.1 Chemicals and lithium-battery materials: the easiest place to confuse “materials” with “battery products”
Annex 1 includes multiple lithium-battery materials such as lithium hexafluorophosphate, lithium cobalt oxide, lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide, and lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide. These fall under direct rebate cancellation and do not qualify for the 6% transitional rate that applies only to the listed battery products in Annex 2. In the first week of implementation, the easiest mistake is to treat everything in the battery value chain as “battery products.”
2.2 Batteries and storage products: the 22 listed items are not at 0% yet, they are at 6%
Primary batteries, nickel-metal hydride batteries, lithium-ion batteries, vanadium redox flow batteries, other accumulators, and related parts on the Annex 2 list remain at a 6% rebate rate through December 31, 2026. The current operational challenge is distinguishing which products have already gone to zero and which remain at 6%, because that difference flows directly into quoting, contract adjustments, and gross-margin forecasting.
2.3 Trading companies and agency exports: document consistency is now more sensitive
Under the 2026 Management Measures, trading companies filing for export VAT rebates need to support the filing with customs declarations, purchase VAT documents, and agency-export proof where applicable. Once the new rules took effect, any mismatch between HS code, customs export date, export invoice, and purchase invoice became much more likely to trigger manual review or a filing correction cycle.
3. Five common filing mistakes to watch in the first week
- Using the contract date instead of the customs export date: the official rule uses the customs export date shown on the declaration. A contract signed in March but declared in April cannot keep the old rate just because the deal was agreed earlier
- Judging by product name instead of HS code: similar names can map to different codes and different treatment. Even within the battery value chain, some goods are already at 0% while others remain at 6%
- Treating all battery-related goods as 6%: the 6% transitional rate applies only to the 22 battery items in Annex 2, not to upstream materials already cancelled under Annex 1
- Updating customs but not quotes or ERP data: this is a classic first-week issue. The declaration side uses the new rules, while the commercial side still quotes using the old rebate assumptions
- Focusing only on the rebate rate and not on the broader filing chain: Announcement No. 11 of 2026 and the 2026 Management Measures rebuilt the refund, exemption, and taxation framework for export business. For goods that no longer qualify for rebate, companies need to recheck not just margin, but also filing, recordkeeping, and internal ledgers
4. How cost models should change now
The examples below are illustrative only and are not tax advice:
- Products that were at 13% and are now at 0%: for a shipment worth CNY 1 million, the rebate inflow can drop by roughly CNY 130,000 if other assumptions stay unchanged. Thin-margin sectors like chemicals, ceramics, and glass will feel the pressure first
- Battery items that were at 9% and are now at 6%: for a shipment worth CNY 1 million, the current phase means roughly CNY 30,000 less rebate inflow than the old assumption. Any company still quoting on the basis of 9% is immediately giving up margin
- Cutover shipments around month-end: orders forecast on a March basis but actually declared after April 1 are the ones most likely to require a rapid gross-margin and contract review
5. Practical checklist exporters should act on now
- Pull a separate order list: isolate all shipments already declared or still pending declaration on or after April 1, 2026, then review them by HS code, customer, salesperson, and product line
- Map the master data: match product master data against Annex 1, Annex 2, and the 2026A rebate-rate database so each SKU is clearly marked as “0%”, “6%”, or “not affected in this round”
- Update every downstream tool: quote templates, finance models, customs declaration logic, and rebate-filing ledgers all need to change together
- Review cutover orders carefully: for shipments around March 31 and April 1, review the customs export date, booking timeline, invoicing time, and customer pricing terms together
- Keep written support: retain the basis for rate judgment, HS classification, and customer repricing so that later filing reviews and internal audits are easier to defend
6. How freight forwarding and customs support can reduce first-week risk
In the first week after a policy switch, the logistics and customs function is not just about moving cargo. It is about keeping booking, customs declaration, document flow, and rebate logic aligned. For chemicals, batteries, solar modules, ceramics, glass, and other sensitive cargo, confirming HS code, declaration timing, and document logic early is the fastest way to reduce later margin gaps and filing rework.
For booking, customs support, cutover-order review, or logistics planning, please contact Mighty International.
7. Official Sources
- Announcement on Adjusting Export VAT Rebate Policies for Solar and Other Products (Announcement No. 2 of 2026)
- Annex 1: Solar and Other Product List
- Annex 2: Battery Product List
- STA Notice on Releasing the 2026A Export Rebate-Rate Database (Shui Zong Huo Lao Han [2026] No. 27)
- Announcement on VAT and Consumption Tax Policies for Export Business (Announcement No. 11 of 2026)
- Announcement on Issuing the Administrative Measures for VAT and Consumption Tax Refund/Exemption for Export Business (STA Announcement No. 5 of 2026)